O’Donnell Calls Trump Lawsuit “Most Ridiculous Ever”
*MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell opened his September 16 broadcast by blasting Donald Trump’s newest lawsuit against the New York Times, calling it “the most ridiculous lawsuit ever by the most ridiculous litigant in history.” His commentary came just a day after the Times published an investigation into back-to-back deals between Trump’s team and the United Arab Emirates involving crypto investments and advanced AI chips.
Filed for $15 billion in damages, Trump’s lawsuit claims the article falsely implied corruption. O’Donnell argued the case is destined to fail under New York Times v. Sullivan, which requires proving “actual malice.” He said the lawsuit was part of Trump’s long history of using legal threats to silence critical reporting.
NYT Report Exposes UAE Crypto and AI Chip Deals
The September 15 Times article, Anatomy of Two Giant Deals, detailed how Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan’s firm MGX invested $2 billion in World Liberty Financial, a crypto startup co-founded by Eric Trump and Steve Witkoff. Two weeks later, the Trump administration approved the UAE’s access to hundreds of thousands of Nvidia AI chips for a massive Abu Dhabi AI campus.
Negotiations were led by David Sacks, Trump’s AI and crypto czar, who had received a White House ethics waiver. The overlap of family profits, foreign money, and sensitive technology raised ethical alarms. Three lawyers told the Times the transactions “violate longstanding norms” of political and diplomatic conduct.
Scroll to continue reading
Ethical and Security Concerns
Experts warned the UAE’s ties to China could expose U.S. technology. National Security Council official David Feith was removed after opposing the deal, following public attacks by MAGA activist Laura Loomer. The Biden administration had previously restricted chip exports to the UAE, but Trump reversed those limits during a Middle East trip.
Economist Ryan Cummings called the combined deals “potentially the largest public corruption scandal in U.S. history.” Senators Elizabeth Warren and Chris Murphy also criticized the moves, with Warren posting on X: “The Trump Administration is cashing in on foreign crypto deals—and weakening guardrails that protect our advanced technology.”
Trump’s Legal Claim and NYT’s Response
Trump’s lawsuit, filed in Tampa federal court, accuses the Times and reporters Eric Lipton, David Yaffe-Bellany, Bradley Hope, Tripp Mickle, and Paul Mozur of defamation. He alleges the article damaged his reputation and business by falsely suggesting a quid pro quo between the UAE’s crypto investment and chip deal approval.
The New York Times dismissed the claims, saying: “This lawsuit has no merit. It lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting.”
O’Donnell Highlights Red Flags in UAE Deals
In his commentary, O’Donnell emphasized Steve Witkoff’s dual role as Trump’s Middle East envoy and a crypto beneficiary, as well as Sacks’ ethics waiver. He warned that the lawsuit threatens press freedom by intimidating reporters investigating foreign financial ties to U.S. leaders.
He also reminded viewers that Trump has sued CNN, ABC, and other outlets before, usually unsuccessfully. “This is not about winning in court,” O’Donnell said. “It’s about frightening journalists from telling the truth.”
Public and Media Reactions
On X, the story trended under #TrumpLawsuit and #UAEGate. Critics echoed O’Donnell, calling the lawsuit a press freedom attack. Supporters claimed the Times exaggerated the deals, framing the transactions as legitimate diplomacy with a U.S. ally.
CNBC and NBC News reported the case faces long odds, while Forbes noted Trump’s claim that the Times used “fabricated evidence.” Rolling Stone and Common Dreams described the UAE deals as “kleptocracy,” citing comparisons to Teapot Dome.
Why This Matters
The lawsuit highlights Trump’s reliance on legal threats to combat damaging reporting, while the Times exposé raises deeper concerns about conflicts of interest, national security, and corruption. With the case just beginning, analysts expect it to be dismissed, but the political and ethical questions remain front and center.
(If You Like This EURweb Story, Please SHARE it!)
MORE NEWS ON EURWEB.COM: Georgia Woman Arrested with 25 Kilos of Fentanyl in Car with Child
We Publish Breaking News 24/7. Don’t Miss Out! Sign up for our Free daily newsletter HERE.
