
*Democratic megadonor John Morgan made headlines on Monday night during an appearance on NewsNation‘s “CUOMO,” where he voiced strong opinions regarding the failed campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris for the presidency.
Morgan alleged that high-profile Democrats, including former President Barack Obama and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, were not in favor of Harris being the party’s nominee to replace President Joe Biden, who announced his withdrawal from the race in July.
According to Morgan, Biden’s endorsement of Harris came almost immediately after he stepped down, suggesting it was a strategic move fueled by underlying tensions within the party. “He nominated her, basically Obama did not want her.
Obama did not endorse her for five days, Pelosi did not want her,” Morgan claimed. He asserted that Biden’s rapid endorsement was interpreted as an “F you” to both Obama and Pelosi, emphasizing a rift among influential figures in the Democratic Party.

Democratic Discontent and Fund Mismanagement
Morgan criticized the way Harris’s campaign managed its finances, stating that the campaign is currently $20 million in debt following what he described as a lavish spending spree.
“The same thing is going to follow Harris for the rest of her career,” Morgan warned, underscoring that the alleged mismanagement of funds could jeopardize her future political endeavors.
He suggested this financial irresponsibility would lead donors to question her trustworthiness: “They cannot be trusted with the money, and the donors are going to be like, ‘Where is this money?’”
In light of these issues, Morgan pointed out that the Democratic Party faced significant hurdles, noting that Harris had not been chosen by voters during primaries or caucuses, which could undermine the legitimacy of her nomination. “We basically ran on this deal where ‘democracy, democracy!’ And then we didn’t have democracy in picking our nominee,” he stated, calling into question the party’s decision-making process.
Morgan’s claims came amidst a backdrop of internal strife within the Democratic National Committee (DNC), where Lindy Li, a member of the DNC finance committee, confirmed that financial confusion had contributed to staff departures. The ramifications of mismanaged funds during the campaign could be significant as the party aspires to unify before the upcoming election.

While Morgan acknowledged Harris’s political talent, particularly during her tenure in California, he dismissed her readiness for the national stage, especially in light of her performance against Donald Trump during their presidential debates.
“She was not ready for prime time, and then they rolled her out in prime time, and she got destroyed,” he said, echoing sentiments that have reverberated through political discussions in recent months.
Despite Harris’s robust resume and the early enthusiasm surrounding her candidacy, Morgan’s statements reflect a growing skepticism about her viability as a candidate going forward. As the Democratic Party grapples with its identity and electoral strategy, the struggles of Harris’s campaign may serve as a cautionary tale for future candidates within the party.
Conclusion
As the Democratic Party prepares for the upcoming election cycle, the scrutiny surrounding Kamala Harris’s campaign and its internal dynamics continues to unfold. John Morgan’s severe critique of party leadership and Harris’s ability to manage both finances and her public image highlights the challenges that lie ahead. Whether the party can regroup and refocus will ultimately determine its success in the face of an increasingly polarized political landscape.
So what do YOU think? Scroll down and select your reaction to this story.

MORE NEWS ON EURWEB.COM: Daughter of Bishop T.D. Jakes Shares Update After His Health Scare | Video