Sunday, September 25, 2022

Pharrell Says ‘Blurred Lines’ Copies Marvin Gaye ‘Feel,’ Not Song

Pharrell Williams is seen outside the Roybal Federal Building on March 4, 2015 in Los Angeles, California. Williams and co-writers of the song "Blurred Lines" are being sued by the children of singer Marvin Gaye for using elements of Gaye's song "Got to Give it Up" in "Blurred Lines."
Pharrell Williams is seen outside the Roybal Federal Building on March 4, 2015 in Los Angeles, California. Williams and co-writers of the song “Blurred Lines” are being sued by the children of singer Marvin Gaye for using elements of Gaye’s song “Got to Give it Up” in “Blurred Lines.”

*Pharrell Williams says his song “Blurred Lines” is not a copy of Marvin Gaye’s song “Got to Give It Up.” What his track with Robin Thicke and T.I. shares with the 1977 R&B classic, he testified in court this week, is “feel; not infringement.”

The trial is currently in its second week in Los Angeles federal court, with the soul singer’s children Frankie and Nona Gaye claiming “Blurred Lines” infringes their late father’s song. The prolific producer (and “The Voice” judge) took the stand Wednesday (March 4), with his co-claimant Thicke present in court for the first time this week. has the details:

Pharrell’s testimony offered an inside look into the recording of one of this decade’s most successful songs, which was revealed in court Tuesday to have earned over $16 million. He testified that never in the songwriting process did “Got to Give It Up” or Gaye’s influential recordings enter his head. Only in promotional media interviews later did he start comparing the tracks, he said. (Thicke testified similarly, with the noteworthy addition of claiming he was drunk and high on Vicodin during every one of his interviews.)

But he conceded there’s a similar feeling to “Blurred Lines” and the Gaye composition. “I must’ve been channeling –” he paused — “that feeling, that late ’70s feeling. Sometimes when you look back on your past work, you see echoes of people. But that doesn’t mean that’s what you were doing.”

His testimony opened with a philosophical exchange with his attorney, Howard King. King first had him explain his manner in the hostile deposition he gave in April, including repeatedly responding “I’m not comfortable” to the Gaye family attorney Richard Busch’s inquiries about his musical education. Busch was “purposefully trying to get a rise out of me. It was very frustrating to me because I have such tremendous respect for Marvin Gaye,” he testified, adding, “I pride myself on being a peaceful person.”

Then King asked what he does professionally. “I’m a musician,” he responded. “I’m happy doing what it is that I do. This has been an incredible journey.” He continued, “Music can be medicinal. When people are going through things, they make a record about it.”

The proceedings then turned to Williams and Thicke’s recording process, which took place over several days in June 2012 at Burbank’s Glenwood Place Studios. The first couple days didn’t produce results, Williams testified. He started generating new ideas on the third — “I call it surfing around. You start with chords or drums. In this case I started with drums,” he said. Thicke was not present, but Williams testified it’s not unusual for him to begin recording without the artist present.

He said that while Gaye’s music didn’t influence the songwriting, his other producing work in the studio that day did. “I had Earl Sweatshirt in one room and Miley Cyrus in the other. I was doing a bunch of country-sounding music with Miley,” he said, so when he went to work on Thicke’s track, bluegrass and “yodeling” were on his mind. “It was like blending this country sound with this up-tempo groove,” he said of “Blurred Lines.”

In about an hour he sent the instrumentals to his engineer Andrew Coleman, who testified that Thicke still wasn’t there by that point.

Thicke testified in previous proceedings that the songwriting was nearly entirely done by Williams. “I remember bouncing ideas back and forth with him, but we didn’t keep any of mine. His were better,” he told the court on Feb. 25. He said otherwise in media interviews because he was jealous of Williams’ work, he said. “I felt it was a little white lie that didn’t hurt his career but boosted mine.”

Williams too testified that he wrote basically every lyric and vocal melody on “Blurred Lines.” (He earned about $5.2 million from the song, compared to the $5.6 million Thicke took home.) Thicke joined him late in the evening, and they immediately started recording the vocals, Williams testified.

“We were bobbing and dancing to it. It was a cool night,” he said. But he confirmed several times in the day’s proceedings that “Got to Give It Up” and Gaye’s other work never consciously influenced his songwriting on “Blurred Lines.” They didn’t intend to insert a rap verse from T.I. a.k.a. Clifford Harris Jr., who is a claimant with Thicke and Williams, and it was only added later (T.I. earned $704,774).

“Why wouldn’t you want to copy Marvin Gaye?” King asked Williams at one point.

“He’s one of the ones we look up to so much. This [court] is the last place I want to be right now,” he responded. “The last thing you want to do as a creator is take something of someone else’s when you love him.”

Continue reading at



  1. Right!!! You were so influenced that you stole it!!! With all due respect. I recognized her from the intro and throughout the entire song..,,,

Comments are closed.



- Advertisement -