Sat, Nov 21, 2009
EURweb |
|
Back to the Article »
Click Here
|
|---|
| Click here to post your comments. |
|
Name:
Brandon
Comment: Huh? EUR, I had to read this story three times to make sure I wasn't missing something. LOL! Reverand Al says, Universal asked for their money back - but they say they didn't. Then Al says, Russell Simmons didn't pay for his agreed upon tables in retaliation -- but Russell says that's not the case. Maybe I'm missing something, but when did "You said boo; No I didn't" statements (minus proof) become news? LOL! Besides, every major record label has produced or distributed artists that have used the word "ho" in tracks. Talk about "milking it for all it's worth." Gimme a break!
|
|
Name:
nightshift
Comment: Al is nothing short of a S0B. He blew off the folks he slandered in the Brawley case, he'll do it here as well
|
|
Name:
MelodyCool
Comment: I hope they don't fall for the ol divide and conquer whites would love to see. Sharpton serves a purpose and his organization incurs expenses like any other. I plan to rally more women to make contributions to NAN. These people hate the rejection and highlighting of their disgusting treatment of black women. They'd never pretend to refer to ALL women in their lyrics. They want to make ensure everyone knows "specifically" who they are calling hos and bishes.
|
|
Name:
khufu
Comment: they want their money back? LOL so they were supporting AL SHarpton and his event because they perceived it as a pay-off or because they truly care about the social causes..the public good? LOL Fook them!
|
|
Name:
HarrisThomas
Comment: . . . and the beat goes on and on . . .
|
|
Name:
FiveMore
Comment: Al Sharpton was being paid off, huh!This is really funny.
|
|
Name:
Kofi
Comment: >Melody, Why would you need to refer to any woman as hos and bytches? Are they not someone's child, mother, sister as well?
|
|
Name:
Mas90
Comment: I don't Al Sharpton would lie about Russell not buying the tables. Obviously, Russell didn't yet from his response. Where is the black womens group on this issue???? I haven't heard once of a black womens group coming forth to tackle this issue.
|
|
Name:
Mas90
Comment: I don't think Al Sharpton would lie about Russell not buying the tables. Obviously, Russell didn't yet from his response. Where is the black womens group on this issue???? I haven't heard once of a black womens group coming forth to tackle this issue.
|
|
Name:
Train
Comment: I think that Rev Al and Rev Jesse should apologize to those kid's from the Duke lacross tea for the way they slammed those them over the lies from that skank.
|
|
Name:
Renetta
Comment: That's it Al, put Russell on front street MAKE his azz pay - weak baztard. He and Chavis and Common looked so weak on Oprah the other night. They are all about making money - they could give a DAM about black women and how WE feel. F them.
|
|
Name:
PositiveB
Comment: Weird and Ironic, but is Imus waking up black America?? Up until Imus made his ridiculous comments, Rev. Al saw LA Reid as someone to honor. Only after his comments did Rev. Al decide otherwise. Now is this true consciousness, or just a case of CYA?
|
|
Name:
HarrisThomas
Comment: Train>> The Duke lacrosse victim is not a skank. A lot of somebodies are glossing over the fact that something did happen to the woman AND three of the "innocent" team players have some funky history like sending an e-mail about wanting to kill a woman, beating up a gay man, and making racist remarks about cotton-picking on an ancestor's plantation. The victim was left slowly twisting in the teams defense attorneys' winds after her "friend" recanted her corroborating story. No apology is warranted. This situation sux like all of the Brawley "coincidences" that were glossed over.
|
|
Name:
gingerg
Comment: McQuirk has finally been fired for his role in the Imus debacle as well.
|
|
Name:
gingerg
Comment: Yesterday, I read that one of the Duke accused, a 24-year-old, has been given a $100,000k plus job on Wall Street.
|
|
Name:
moonbeams
Comment: Well, I think the Duke stripper is a lowlife because if she lied and deceived/tricked so many people into believing in her and supporting her cause then she has no scruples. Conversely, if "something" did occur and she took a payoff or for whatever reason chose to not move forward with the case, she is without scruples as well. She talked to a reporter and got the wagons circling, so if she was lying or did not plan to fight it out, then I have no respect for her. Finally, the examiner/DNA results revealed that there was DNA from five different men on her. That defines a skank to me.
|
|
Name:
justafu
Comment: Sounds to me they're sort of DUMPING on LA Reid! Boy that really helps alot!!!
|
| Back to Top |
| Click here to post your comments. |
| Back to the Article » Click Here |
|---|
...
